- ► 2018 (109)
- ► 2017 (159)
- ► 2016 (172)
- ► 2015 (127)
- ► 2014 (118)
- Matteo Garrone | Gomorrah
- Irving Reis | The Big Street
- Jack Smith | Flaming Creatures
- Jean Vigo | Zéro de conduit (Zero for Conduct)
- Jean Vigo | À Propos de Nice
- Cllint Eastwood | Flags of Our Fathers / Letters f...
- Yasujirō Ozu | Tōkyō Monogatari (Tokyo Story)
- Apichatpong Weerasethakul | Uncle Boonmee Who Can ...
- Bernardo Bertolucci | Il conformista (The Conformi...
- Tom Hopper | Les Misérables
- Ira Sachs | Keep the Lights On
- Paul Thomas Anderson | The Master
- Richard Linklater | Bernie
- David O. Russell | Silver Linings Playbook
- Matteo Garrone | Reality
- Cristian Mungiu | După dealuri (Beyond the Hills)
- Kleber Mendonça Filho | O soma o redor (Neighborin...
- John Madden | The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel
- Sam Mendes | Skyfall
- Wes Anderson | Moonrise Kingdom
- Michael Haneke | Amour
- Terence Davies | The Deep Blue Sea
- Steven Spielberg | Lincoln
- ▼ January (23)
- ► 2012 (147)
- ► 2011 (134)
Wednesday, January 2, 2013
Terence Davies | The Deep Blue Sea
pleasure, passion, lustby Douglas Messerli
Terence Davies (screenplay, based on the play by Terence Rattigan), Terence Davies (director) The Deep Blue Sea / 2011, USA 2012
Although director Terence Davies admits to some admiration for David Lean’s Brief Encounter, with nods to it in his new film, The Deep Blue Sea, I would argue that the two are utterly different in approaches and impacts. Certainly both films are stories of illicit love affairs in Postwar England, a time when such behavior was not only—to use the language of the day—“frowned upon,” but was actually scandalous, particularly for the upper class, to which the heroine of Davies’ work belongs. And both films end with their couples parting company, leaving, especially their women, lonely and romantically “devastated.” But whereas Lean’s heroine does not engage in sex and has little to show for her “romantic slip,” Lady Hester Collyer (the radiant Rachel Weisz) of The Deep Blue Sex is a woman of passion whose only link with her lover, Freddie Page (Tom Hiddleston), is sex. While the suburban housewife of Brief Encounter is a meek and shy lover, Hester, as her Scarlet Letter-first name implies, is not only sexually active, but is a passionate woman determined, despite the mores of the day, to engage her whole being in sexuality. Like Lawrence’s male figures or the exceptional Lady Chatterly, Hester—as opposed to the advice of her dreadful mother-in-law—is willing commit herself wholeheartedly to passion, or, as her husband, Sir William Collyer describes it, lust. At the end of the day (and the movie), unlike the regretful Laura of Lean’s work, Hester is fully aware of what she has had and what she will now miss. Finally, Davies’ work, unlike Lean’s tepid black and white teashop drama, is a richly dark, color rendering of a cheap rooming house and backstreet bar which Hester has replaced from her beautiful but deadly boring manor house life.
That is not to say she is any happier than Laura at film’s end. If anything, Laura will go on living as the faithful wife and mother, while Laura will face, perhaps, poverty and sexual deprivation. At least Hester knows who she is. Her only real failure in life is her attempted suicide at the film’s beginning, an event which catapults her into the haunting loneliness she must face at the end.
Far more sensitive, if almost asexual, is her wealthy husband. He would never go off golfing and forget his wife’s birthday, which Freddie has. He might never brutally scream at her for seeking out culture, for desiring to engage her mind as well as her body. But then, William, would prefer sleeping—as his mother and father clearly did—in separate beds. He is the kind of man, the son of the kind of woman, who, as Davies recently comically described in an Los Angeles Times interview, knows exactly how to spoon up soup: employing the spoon in the direction away from the diner, into the center of the bowl, instead of from the center toward oneself (as a Cambridge attendee of Davies’ movies explained to him). The action of the disavowal of self is symbolic, one might argue, and is at the heart of their loveless relationship: Sir Collyer has no self from which to love, while Hester would devour life—certainly a dangerous position to be in after the self-sacrifice and destruction of war-torn London, an image of which Davies leaves the viewer at film’s close.
The problem with Hester is that she is a sensualist at a time when the society as a whole has been diminished, individuals transformed from living, breathing humans into somewhat frightened prescribers of the principles of life. Passion, as Hester’s mother-in-law has proclaimed, is a dangerous thing. Even her flowers, which Hester is passionate about, give her only pleasure, as if that were the best one might expect from life. As the Page’s landlady puts it, “Love is about wiping your lover’s ass,” of being there day after day, not worth killing oneself!
In his own way, Hester’s Freddie is also willing to take chances, determined as he is to return to work as a test pilot as soon as he becomes sober again. Yet his adventure is one that excludes others except those of his same sex. And in that sense, although he may be a wonderful lover in bed, he has almost as sexless in life as Sir Collyer! Here, unlike Lean’s hysterically loyal Laura, Hester, in the penultimate scene of Davies’ beautiful film, has—again as Lawrence might have put it—“come through,” boldly pulling open the curtains as she stands determinedly looking out to the street, facing forward to the future.