- ► 2018 (109)
- Ciro Guerra | El abrazo de la serpiente (Embrace o...
- Martin McDonagh | Three Billboards Outside of Ebbi...
- Luca Guadagino | Call Me by Your Name
- Harold Pinter | Butley
- Nobuo Nakagawa | 地獄 Jigoku (The Sinners of Hell)
- Carl Theodor Dreyer | Du skal ære din hustru (Mast...
- Mehmet Binay and Canner Alpert | Zenne Dancer
- Ḗric Rohmer | Ma nuit chez Maud (My Night at Maud'...
- King Vidor | Cynara
- ▼ December (9)
- ► 2016 (172)
- ► 2015 (127)
- ► 2014 (118)
- ► 2013 (124)
- ► 2012 (147)
- ► 2011 (134)
Wednesday, December 6, 2017
Carl Theodor Dreyer | Du skal ære din hustru (Master of the House)
the great tyrant
by Douglas Messerli
Carl Theodor Dreyer and Sven Rindom (writers, based on Rindom’s play), Carl Theodor Dreyer (director) Du skal ære din hustru (Master of the House) / 1925
Unlike that grand tyrant of our times, however, Viktor, at least according to Ida’s testimony, is not truly a bad man, but, having lost his business to bankruptcy, has simply transferred his anger to his devoted and now suffering family. And the wise Mads (as the family members have renamed Mathilde), who has watched this monster with a smoldering sense of horror for some time, has plotted out his authoritarian demise. Having safely transplanted Ida to a safe and hidden location, she begins to run the house in a way that forces the tyrant to realize the errors of his ways.
Unlike Ida, she forces him to participate in the daily care of house and family members, which Viktor, recalling her sometimes harsh penalties for misbehavior in his youth, reluctantly obeys. Dreyer brilliantly portrays an increasing series of daily upbraids and orders as she forces him to help with the laundry, now hanging in the kitchen where he has previously forbidden Ida to place it, to help with food preparation, and to light his own fires, fetch his own shoes, and even care for the children he is rearing. Such an exhausting schedule not only does not permit his frequent visits to a local pub, but gradually helps him to realize just how much work his wife has endured previously alone.
“Mads” is indeed a more than a bit “mad,” but underneath it all, the director helps us realize, she does have a heart of gold, and realizes that it has become necessary to retrain her early pupil. And when he truly shows signs of breaking because he sorely misses his loving wife, she summons the girl home, forcing her to hide in a cabinet for a brief period so that she might witness Viktor’s transformations.
It the entire shift in behavior seems a bit unlikely, and if we wonder whether it might represent a more permanent psychological change, Dreyer’s deft handling of this domestic satire is, nonetheless, entertaining and, more importantly, educational. Beware you male chauvinists, he seems to be claiming in a day when few other males had arrived at this conclusion, the day of reckoning will soon arrive! Ida’s mother even suggests a new career for the baffled tyrant, writing out a check so that he might purchase an available optometrist's shop—perhaps since he has simply come to better see how things are.
Coming just after Dreyer’s masterful study of a homosexual behavior, Michael, and only 3 years before his significant portrait of Joan of Arc, Master of the House seems purposefully like the lighter piece it is. Yet, the Danes certainly seemed to comprehend its metaphorical implications in the manner of the nearby Norwegian, Henrik Ibsen’s earlier play, A Doll’s House. The film was well-received in Denmark, and is now recognized as a gem of silent-film productions.
If nothing else, in its straight-forward and spare direction, much like the determinedly level-headed Mads, Dreyer’s film makes it point almost immediately. In just the first 7 minutes of the film, we, like Mads, perceive what’s truly amiss in the Frandsen household, which the rest of the film demonstrates how to solve. If most of Dreyer’s films do not have such seemingly easy solutions, shifting as they do between deep religious and personal compulsions, Master of the House, nevertheless, explores the boundaries between explicit expressions of authority and individual needs and desires, which ultimately can and do trump superficial ideas of power.
Los Angeles, December 6, 2017
Reprinted from World Cinema Review (December 2017).